On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 10:08 -0400, L. Mark Stone wrote:
> Started noticing the system flagging spam emails but not deleting them:
[cut]
> Jun 11 07:37:18 pinot amavis[10738]: (10738-04) spam_scan: hits=24.677  
> tests=BAYES_99,HTML_50_60,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3,HTML_TEXT_AFTER_BODY,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,TW_EH,TW_NH,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL
> Jun 11 07:37:18 pinot amavis[10738]: (10738-04) SPAM,  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> <realemailaddressremoved>, Yes,  
> hits=24.7 tag1=-999.0 tag2=4.0 kill=4.0 tests=BAYES_99, HTML_50_60,  
> HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20, HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3,  
> HTML_TEXT_AFTER_BODY, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,  
> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100, RAZOR2_CHECK,  
> TW_EH, TW_NH, URIBL_JP_SURBL, URIBL_OB_SURBL, URIBL_SBL, URIBL_WS_SURBL
> Jun 11 07:37:18 pinot amavis[10738]: (10738-04) FWD via SMTP:  
> [127.0.0.1]:10025 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->  
> <realemailaddressremoved>
> 
> System is SuSE Linux Enterprise Server9 with spamassassin 3.1.0 and amavis
> 
> Spamassassin lints OK, and here are relevant portions of  
> /etc/amavisd.conf (probably may wordwrap).
[cut]

> Given the configuration, I would have expected the message to have  
> been discarded.  What did I miss?

By any chance did you accidentally set $final_spam_destiny to D_PASS in
the config file? There's a line that does this, but it's commented out
by default.

        -Bill


Reply via email to