I'm very sorry for not being clearer or provide the required information.
The change is that the X-Spam headers are now at the very top of the headers
section, whereas previously they had been at the bottom of the headers. This
is not a problem, but was unexpected and I thought it to be some sort of
error. I thought the standard was to add new headers to the bottom of the
list of headers so you could see clearly in which order the headers had been
added. I will not be using domain keys and as I think it is neater having
the X-Spam headers at the bottom of the headers list I would like to have
some sort of conf option to have them how they were, but this does not seem
possible.

I realise that I should always provide platform information and all those
details but sometimes I forget and this time I thought that it was a General
SpamAssassin issue which was probably why I thought it unnecessary. As it
turns out, it wasn't a platform specific problem after all.

However, thanks for your help and sorry for causing trouble and confusion.

Ben

PS What is the best medium to search the list archives, because I have not
been very successful in finding relevant posts when I have problems?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sietse van Zanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 12 June 2006 13:24
To: SpamAssassin Users
Subject: RE: X-Spam-Headers at top of email

Well, I think he was talking about the headers popping up in the e-mail (the
body), and thtat is definitely a problem. And looks very much like the
problem casued by/with spamass-milter. 
 
But he indeed should have been more clear, not even specifying whcih
platform, new + old versions, configurations etc.
I wonder why people are nowedays even becoming too lazy to take a little
time explaining their problems and still expect people to readily give them
the correct answers. I also wonder, why I keep replying. :-) Though my rule
of thumb is, short questions, get short answers....
 
-Sietse

 
________________________________

From: Anthony Peacock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 12-Jun-06 14:02
To: SpamAssassin Users
Subject: Re: X-Spam-Headers at top of email



Hi Sietse,

The original poster didn't actually explain why this was a problem for
him.  So I was explaining why the position of the headers had changed.

Sietse van Zanen wrote:
> Well, it has. But AFAIK it has not caused problems on other than
spamass-milter.
> 
> Search the mailing list, there's much more on this issue. But not sure
about win2003 installations of it.
> 
> -Sietse
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Ben Wylie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mon 12-Jun-06 13:40
> To: Sietse van Zanen; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: X-Spam-Headers at top of email
>
>
>
> I am running SpamAssassin version 3.1.2 on windows 2003 server called via
> the command line, so I think it must be something in SpamAssassin that has
> changed.
>
> Thanks
> Ben
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sietse van Zanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 June 2006 12:00
> To: Ben Wylie; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: X-Spam-Headers at top of email
>
> It's a bug in spamass-milter 0.3.0. Upgrade to 0.3.1
>
> -Sietse
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Ben Wylie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mon 12-Jun-06 12:56
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: X-Spam-Headers at top of email
>
>
>
> For some reason when I upgraded recently, Spamassassin is now placing the
> X-Spam headers at the top of the email rather than at the end of the
headers
> section as it had been. Is there an option I can set, or does anyone know
> why it has suddenly changed where it puts the headers?
>
> Thanks
> Ben
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
Anthony Peacock
CHIME, Royal Free & University College Medical School
WWW:    http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhiajp/
"If you have an apple and I have  an apple and we  exchange apples
then you and I will still each have  one apple. But  if you have an
idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us
will have two ideas." -- George Bernard Shaw




Reply via email to