> >> These occur with spamassassin -D --lint. RDJ is up to date, as is > >> sa-update. > >> > >> [6837] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has > undefined dependency > >> 'DCC_CHECK' > >> [6837] info: rules: meta test SARE_SPEC_PROLEO_M2a has dependency > >> 'MIME_QP_LONG_LINE' with a zero score > >> [6837] info: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has undefined > >> dependency 'SARE_XMAIL_SUSP2' > >> [6837] info: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has undefined > >> dependency 'SARE_HEAD_XAUTH_WARN' > >> [6837] info: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency > >> 'SARE_RD_SAFE_MKSHRT' > >> [6837] info: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency > >> 'SARE_RD_SAFE_GT' > >> [6837] info: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency > >> 'SARE_RD_SAFE_TINY' > >> [6837] info: rules: meta test SARE_OBFU_CIALIS has > undefined dependency > >> 'SARE_OBFU_CIALIS2' > >> [6837] info: rules: meta test FP_MIXED_PORN3 has undefined > dependency > >> 'FP_PENETRATION' > > > > It's just info. Some of your rules have undefined > dependencies or are > > disabled via a zero score. > > If the rule is part of a meta a zero score on the rule should not > matter. It should still be evaluated because ultimately it has an > indirect score via the meta rule. > > I like to see the sub-rules of a meta rule hitting for tracking. So > I always issue a 0.001 score or something like that which will not > affect results materially.
So what we're saying here is that if you create a META rule on a disabled (scored 0) rule, the META rule doesn't work? Didn't work before either? Or still works but generates an info debug message? Guess I should go dig out the rest of this converation and go read the bug discussion... Having to score every component of a META rule seems like a bad thing... My MTA integration only allows for 4K of headers to add and I'm already exceeding it fairly often. Adding more insignificant rules to the list will just make it that much worse... I guess it's time to write my own integration code... Ugh. Bret
