jdow writes:
> From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Panagiotis Christias writes:
> >> On 8/11/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > DAve wrote:
> >> > > Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> >> > >> On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >>> FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from 
> >> > >>> sha1sum.
> >> > >>> Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that you showed?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Answering my own question, FreeBSD seems to not have a "sha1sum",
> >> > >>> but has a "sha1" which has that kind of format, which seems to be the
> >> > >>> same output as "openssl sha1 file".  Of course to be consistent,
> >> > >>> "openssl ssl < file" produces just the hash.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> FYI, on FreeBSD you can use "sha1 -r file" (-r Reverses the format of
> >> > >> the output).
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > > I have no sha1 command in my bin dirs, locate doesn't find one either.
> >> > > man openssl doesn't show an -r switch as well, and any use of it fails.
> >> > > FreeBSD 4.8, 4.11, 5.2.1, 5.3 using openssl 0.9.7e don't seem to have
> >> > > the sha1 command (all upgraded via ports). The earliest I can find it 
> >> > > on
> >> > > my servers is 5.4, using the FreeBSD included openssl.
> >> > >
> >> > > It might show up when I upgrade the port.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Nope, upgraded all the way to 0.9.8b, no sha1 command.
> >> 
> >> /sbin/sha1 is part of the base system since FreeBSD 5.3. The openssl
> >> command included in the base system supports the sha1 command. Here is
> >> a (dirty?) way to get your output:
> >> 
> >> openssl sha1 your-file | sed -e 's/^SHA1(//' -e 's/)=//' -e 's/^\(.*\)
> >> \([^ ]*$\)/\2 \1/'
> > 
> > It should be possible to use a perl one-liner with the Digest::SHA1
> > module, too, which is a SpamAssassin required module anyway ;)
> 
> Er RDJ is a simple bash script, I understand.
> 
> Add three lines to execute sa-update if it is present right at the end
> of the normal RDJ update. Why rewrite the world?

Wrong thread!  This one is discussing *generating* sa-update files, not
downloading them.

--j.

Reply via email to