> -----Original Message----- > From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:56 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report > > Starting out with another clean database, further testing > shows that in fact > the message was learned when I ran 'spamassassin -r' (though > bayes_toks > remained at 12288 bytes), and the same message was learned > again when I ran > 'sa-learn --spam' (and the size once again grew to 24576 bytes). > > 0.000 0 1 0 non-token data: nspam > 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nham > 0.000 0 177 0 non-token data: ntokens > > 0.000 0 2 0 non-token data: nspam > 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nham > 0.000 0 500 0 non-token data: ntokens > > Gary V
Ok, I'll bet that spamassassin -r and sa-learn --spam strip different headers from the emails prior to deciding if they have been learned. why did spamassassin -r only learn 177 tokens and sa-learn --spam learn 323 tokens? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO 561-999-5000, ext 1131 SECNAP Network Security Corporation Keep up to date with latest information on IT security: Real time security alerts: http://www.secnap.com/news
