Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sat, September 23, 2006 15:20, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> Also, I personally view ANY spamassassin whitelisting feature as a
>> measure of last resort. It's generally better to whitelist by
>> configuring your tools to not call SA in the first place. You have more
>> reliable envelope information, AND you gain CPU usage benefits.
>>
>
> change score on whitelist_from solves most here
>
> else ham is not learned from local users
>
>
Eh? How does changing the score solve anything? You do know that the
whitelist score doesn't affect the autolearner, right?
