David Ulevitch writes: >On Sep 30, 2006, at 3:30 AM, Justin Mason wrote: > >> David Ulevitch writes: >>> >>> Donald, >>> >>> We handle DNSBLs but not URIBLs, at the moment. Passing along to >>> Noah to see what he can do. Sorry you had this happen to your >>> SpamAssassin scoring. (Time to check mine... :-) ) >>> >>> You can resolve this behavior by turning off typo correction in your >>> preferences page and it'll work again with us returning NXDOMAIN >>> (RCODE=3) instead of doing the typo correction service. Hopefully we >>> can get more granular with that in the future. >>> >>> If you are on a dynamic IP, well, just sit tight for a couple more >>> weeks or email me to start beta testing some code this week to handle >>> dynamic IPs (and that offer is for anyone). >> >> David -- >> >> Thanks for commenting, and good to hear it doesn't affect traditional >> DNSBL lookups. It sounds like we should probably add a temporary >> SpamAssassin FAQ entry for this? >> > >Justin, > >That sounds like a good idea. Want me to write one up for you in the >style of the SA FAQ or is there enough in my post above to toss one >in until we are better able to address URIBLs?
David -- if you could add it to the FAQ at http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FixingErrors that'd be great -- it's a wiki, so editing is easy. I'm not quite sure of all the details, so I'd prefer if someone with more knowledge could write it up. cheers ;) --j.
