Justin Mason wrote: > Matt Kettler writes: > >> What's going on? What magic do I need to make whiteclnt work properly in >> a SA 3.1.x environment when using dccifd? >> > > er, I think it'd need to be implemented ;) > > The whole idea of manually whitelisting all the DCC FPs is anathema to the > SpamAssassin model -- instead we try to just accept the FPs and adjust the > score to cope. Hence we've never added support for whiteclnt. > > Of course, the advice on this very list is that if you're using DCC, you must make use of DCC whitelists for all your high-volume mailing lists.
I've got some pretty significant problems where DCC is matching solicited commercial bulk mail. That same solicited commercial bulk mail are often already borderline in score, and the combination results in a FP. While it's difficult to get these guys to stop using things like broken HTML, third party hosting that's URIBLed, or third party sending service that's in SpamCop, I can affect the DCC processing. So I'm stuck with the alternative of whitelisting the whole sender in SA with whitelist_from_rcvd or def_whitelist_from_rcvd. Which is a little over-strong for this situation. That said, Paul seems to have env_from dcc whitelists working, so I'll have to delve further into my problem.
