Clifton Royston wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:31:39AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> What can I do to catch and handle Spam that has profanity with fuzzy >> matching? >> >> Is there anything that has a good level of accuracy of trapping porn spam? >> > > Try the SARE Adult ruleset. They've worked fairly well for me; not > perfect. > I think you missed the "fuzzy" word in the original email. From what I can see, the SARE Adult rule tags spam that use English "rude words" - not words that have been - well - fuzzed - to bypass such rules.
We've seen a real increase in these too. SA can't see them very well as they aren't good English (actually, neither is that sentence. Let's not go there ;-) Simply adding dup letters, etc totally throws off standard word matching. However, there's no reason why the rulesets couldn't include such mis-spellings... -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
