Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
Included below is a legitimate e-mail on a legitimate payment that I
did make.
I've looked at the rule, and I can't figure out why it failed.
After unwrapping the mail included in your message body, I can't
reproduce this under SA 3.1.8-r454679 using the ruleset
70_sare_spoof_cf_sare_sa-update_dostech_net/200607251600.cf.
If you can provide a copy that triggers this in an attachment I'll take
another look.
Yeah, I was eyeballing it but couldn't figure it out either. Very odd.
Is there any part of this rule that might be affected by using Amavisd
or testing via Milter? (I do both)
Unrelated, but might I suggest for readability that next time you do an
update, change CHASE_B to BIGFOOT or something?
--
Jo Rhett
Network/Software Engineer
Net Consonance
