Jeff Hardy writes: > Hello all, > > I've been diddling with some tests and wondered why there is a spamhaus > URIBL_SBL, but not URIBL_XBL (or better yet, combined URIBL_SBL-XBL). I > can create this myself easy enough, but wondered if there was a reason > XBL is not included. Thanks.
Basically, it didn't work well ;) Try it out -- it doesn't correlate well with spam. --j.
