Jeff, > Not to start any flamewars, but does anyone have strong opinions > on MailScanner versus Amavisd-new for use with postfix (and of > course SpamAssassin and ClamAV)?
Of course I'm biased, but I'd be worried running program with about 400 cases of calling system routines (I/O, file system, etc.) without checking resulting status or failing to report errors. MailScanner works while everything is in order. When unexpected happens (e.g. disk full, I/O or file system errors, depleted system resources), then unpredictable things are bound to result, and possibly go by unnoticed for some time or prove difficult to diagnose. Mark
