Kenneth Porter writes: > --On Friday, November 03, 2006 5:43 PM +0000 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > there's a rule that matches them in 3.1.x sa-update, fwiw. > > I don't see it either. What's the name of the rule?
for what it's worth, it's 'RCVD_FORGED_WROTE'. > Dates on files in /var/lib/spamassassin are 20061024. > > I ran sa-update -D and got this at the end: > > [7784] dbg: channel: attempting channel updates.spamassassin.org > [7784] dbg: channel: update directory > /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org > [7784] dbg: channel: channel cf file > /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org.cf > [7784] dbg: channel: channel pre file > /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001007/updates_spamassassin_org.pre > [7784] dbg: channel: metadata version = 431276 > [7784] dbg: dns: 7.1.3.updates.spamassassin.org => 431276, parsed as 431276 > [7784] dbg: channel: current version is 431276, new version is 431276, > skipping channel > > > Is this new rule supposed to be in 431276? > > I also tried running the DNS query with dig against a few of the servers > for that zone and get the same answer, so it's not my local DNS server > caching an old answer. > > I chased through the update logic and found the update archive here: > > <http://spamassassin.kluge.net/updates/> > > I see some later updates there, and the "wrote" rule is in 472539. Is the > DNS not getting updated to push these new rules out? Hi guys -- yes, I think you're right -- it looks like SpamAssassin 3.1.x rule updates are not generated automatically, unlike the trunk ones :( Theo, what's the procedure to push out 3.1.x updates? --j.
