On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:15:35 -0500, "Joe Zitnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>> On 12/1/2006 at 7:01 AM, Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Guys -- vague hints as to the contents of the mail really don't help. > >> >> It's spam -- we're all getting thousands of spams a day, most of us >(ok, I >> for one at least) seem to be finding those going into the spam bins >> without our help, and I'd say it's unlikely that many of us (ok, me >> again ;) are going to go rooting through the trash there looking for >> something that seems to match what you're hinting at. >> >> Why not just post a spample, or a link to one? >> >> --j. >> >> Joe Zitnik writes: >>> >>> On 12/1/2006 at 5:22 AM, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: >>> On Friday 01 December 2006 00:29, Loren Wilton wrote: >>> > guess you're just lucky. I just went through the last month's >spam >>> and I >>> > can't find anything with a subject about credit ratings. >>> >>> Oh, no, I didn't mean to suggest it was in the subject. >>> >>> Its usually some random subject. Then a paragraph starting with >"your >>> credit >>> rating doesn't matter to us" with the usual misspellings, etc, >followed >>> by >>> (usually) a geocities link and some random text at the end. >>> >>> -- >>> _____________________________________ >>> John Andersen >>> >>> >>> I was wondering the same thing. Even given the random text, I >would >>> think between the default rules, and the fact that I've dumped a >bunch >>> in to bayes, that the spammy content would be enough to nail them >for >>> sure. I'm still seeing a significant number skate by. > > >It wasn't really a vague hint, or rather, if you're receiving them, you >know exactly the spam he's talking about. I wasn't asking for a >solution, I was just commenting on the fact that, like John, I was >surprised these spams would make it through. At least that's why I >didn't post the contents or a link to the contents. I'm glad you didn't or I'd have missed the thread. I have a content filter running for those. I got sick and tired of checking hundreds daily during my fp checks. Now I just root them at the MTA. Prior to that SA was catching them though. Perhaps you are missing a key rule or update? Nigel
