>> Question 2. Suppose the domain name in the Message-ID >> header does not match the domain name in the From >> header. For instance, the From header is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> and the Message-ID header is "<xxxx... @xyz.com>" . >> Will SpamAssassin consider this as an invalid message >> id and so consider the email as possible spam? >> > Personally, I would consider this a weak but possibly usable spam sign. > That said, SA does not appear to do so.
In SpamAssassin's FAQ, I found this page, OeSixForwardFps (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OeSixForwardFps), which mentioned: "If the domain name in the message ID does not match the domain name in the From: header, the message may hit the SpamAssassin 'MID_ADDED_BY_RELAY' rules, and therefore may cause a false positive." I want to find further information about the MID_ADDED_BY_RELAY rule. So, I searched for the keyword "MID_ADDED_BY_RELAY" on google but found that the keyword "MID_ADDED_BY_RELAY" did not exist in other places on the web. Is MID_ADDED_BY_RELAY an old rule that does not exist in SpamAssassin any more? Thanks. Jack _______________________________________ YM - 離線訊息 就算你沒有上網，你的朋友仍可以留下訊息給你，當你上網時就能立即看到，任何說話都冇走失。 http://messenger.yahoo.com.hk
