Office of the Postmaster writes: > > > > A 3-5% ratio of our email is getting tagged with HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32 which > > > according to the DOC is HTML: images with 2800-3200 bytes of words. The > > >Yes, it's the message size that's in question, not the "<img>" tag. it's > >expected that the rule may fire on ham -- that's why it only scores 1.6 > >points (max). 1.6 is far below the 5.0 threshold... > > > Thank you. That explains it then. I suppose there is no fix for the false > positives then? Since its the total message size. I began thinking that > maybe it was a \n versus a \r issue as most of the emails being tagged that > way had \n for the line breaks instead of \r hard returns.
1.6 points is not an FP. it's expected that some rules *will* fire on ham -- but just not in conjunction with enough *other* rules to push it over the 5-point threshold. --j.
