> > Speaking of ninjas one slipped in here and whispered in my ear that > > the original problem rocsca had might benefit from the anti > drug rules > > on the SARE web site. He should read the various rule set > descriptions > > and pick those which fit his situation best. > > Fine! I agree with you!! But I can't figure out what SARE > rules I I have to use to block that email that SA does not block.. > > Moreover, could I update it with rules_du_jour? > > PS: I have the following conf for rules_du_jour.. > > TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE RANDOMVAL BOGUSVIRUS";
Maybe I have to use 70_sare_obfu*.cf ruleset files? It seems to me that my SA configuration doesn't load them.. Infact I have this only cf files other that in SA dir (/etc/mail/spamassassin): path_to_SA/10_misc.cf path_to_SA/20_advance_fee.cf path_to_SA/20_anti_ratware.cf path_to_SA/20_body_tests.cf path_to_SA/20_compensate.cf path_to_SA/20_dnsbl_tests.cf path_to_SA/20_drugs.cf path_to_SA/20_fake_helo_tests.cf path_to_SA/20_head_tests.cf path_to_SA/20_html_tests.cf path_to_SA/20_meta_tests.cf path_to_SA/20_net_tests.cf path_to_SA/20_phrases.cf path_to_SA/20_porn.cf path_to_SA/20_ratware.cf path_to_SA/20_uri_tests.cf path_to_SA/23_bayes.cf path_to_SA/25_accessdb.cf path_to_SA/25_antivirus.cf path_to_SA/25_body_tests_es.cf path_to_SA/25_body_tests_pl.cf path_to_SA/25_dcc.cf path_to_SA/25_dkim.cf path_to_SA/25_domainkeys.cf path_to_SA/25_hashcash.cf path_to_SA/25_pyzor.cf path_to_SA/25_razor2.cf path_to_SA/25_replace.cf path_to_SA/25_spf.cf path_to_SA/25_textcat.cf path_to_SA/25_uribl.cf PS: What other cf file is worth to use without overload the server? BR, rocsca