Mark Martinec writes: > On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote: > > I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency > > situations. > > Ok. Still, in my experience about 30 (maybe 50) SA processes can > fully utilize today's CPU & I/O, and it's probably no big deal > to provide about 2 GB of memory to cater for such system. > Also, and unfortunately, multithreading in Perl is rather > cumbersome and not significantly less expensive than fully > individual processes.
yep -- that's pretty much what I've found, too. The earlier, non-ithreads version is pretty much nonfunctional :( --j.