Mark Martinec writes:
> On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote:
> > I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency
> > situations.
> 
> Ok. Still, in my experience about 30 (maybe 50) SA processes can
> fully utilize today's CPU & I/O, and it's probably no big deal
> to provide about 2 GB of memory to cater for such system.
> Also, and unfortunately, multithreading in Perl is rather
> cumbersome and not significantly less expensive than fully
> individual processes.

yep -- that's pretty much what I've found, too.  The earlier, non-ithreads
version is pretty much nonfunctional :(

--j.

Reply via email to