Hi Jo,
At 16:17 21-02-2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
The point of sending a note about this to the mailing list is that
this problem will effect *EVERYONE* who gets crackberry messages, and
thus it could probably use a real fix instead of forcing everyone to
fix it locally.
The problem affects people using the LW_STOCK_SPAM4 rule with a low
reject score when they receive blackberry messages. As mentioned
previously, LW_STOCK_SPAM4 is not a rule distributed with SpamAssassin.
I'm really not sure what you are talking about. We could always fix
the ruleset instead of ride-em-cowboy hacking the local config on
every server...
A fix for blackberry messages opens the way for abuse. That is why
site-specific rules to reduce the score were suggested earlier in the
discussion.
Well, why don't you report it to them?
Because I don't view it as a problem for a message to a mailing list
discussing about spam.
Regards,
-sm