On Tue, March 20, 2007 13:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Erik Slooff wrote: > >> I have an interesting observation on my mail gateway (policyd for >> greylisting, postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin); after implementing >> greylisting and other measures such as RBLs there aren't enough spam >> messages coming through to keep bayes trained. > > Hey, > > I did not have this problem (yet), I've just implemented greylisting maybe > 3 weeks ago. Though it's an interesting problem, I assume I can have the > same once. > > The solution seems simple to me, I guess. Just exclude a few dummy > addresses (take common names) from your greylisting rules, those addresses > will catch all the new spam and will train your database. > > I'm using smf-grey, it's easy to exclude addresses or even entire domains > from greylisting, I assume your greylisting method can do the same. > > btw, what kind of tool do you use to produce those graphs? > > Regards, > K. > Interesting feedback; I'll have a try to tune policyd to achieve this.
I use mailgraph: http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~dws/software/mailgraph Erik
