I utilize amavisd-maia (Maia Mailguard) which provides updated rules
stats. The program also provides an easy method to constantly train
your bayes filters. You might want to take a look at it.
Best
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 15:03 +0100, Chris Lear wrote:
* Matt Kettler wrote (19/04/07 14:49):
<snip>
If you want to know how accurate a particular rule is, by comparing the
spam vs nonspam hit rates, those stats are useless, because of the bias.
You need a manually sorted corpus to get this kind of information.
If you want to see which rules are getting used a lot, vs those that are
rarely getting used, these stats are quite useful.
If you want a "top x rules" list, sa-stats can do that for you:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats.txt
http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt is probably a bit
better in this case.
It will parse a spamd logfile and report the most-frequently used spam
and nonspam rules (and you can configure how many it will list for each)
The 1.0 version can do per-domain and per-user info, given a 3.1 log.
Yes, this is all I'm after, but we use Amavisd-new to pass off to SA,
not spamd. The amavisd logs don't seem to show that information. Will it
work? Or is there a way to do this with amavisd?
|
- Re: Rules report Craig Carriere
-
