On 5/8/2007 7:18 PM, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
Is anyone else seeing an increased FP rate after upgrading to 3.2?
I've got a number of reports coming in like:
AXB_XMID_1212, which defaults to 3.899 and was
causing a fair amount of legitimate mail to one of our customers to fail
Replace 'AXB_XMID_1212' with a handful of other rules with substantial
scores and the reports are pretty much all the same. One rule with a high
score matching on HAM with a couple of minor low scoring rules pushing the
message over the edge.
#counts AXB_XMID_1212 260s/0h of 19804 corpus (15215s/4589h) 5/10/07
AXB_XMID_1212 -- suggested score: 1.666 (of 5)
#counts AXB_XMID_1212 272s/1h of 9297 corpus (4867s/4430h) 05/10/07
AXB_XMID_1212 -- suggested score: 1.311 (of 5)
I wonder why it was scored so high...
score AXB_XMID_1212 3.899 3.899 3.899 3.496 # n=2
JM?
