On 9 May 2007 at 22:34, Matt Kettler wrote: Date sent: Wed, 09 May 2007 22:34:48 -0400 From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: 3 spamc questions, version 3.2 To: ".rp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Copies to: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> .rp wrote: > > I just switched from using spamassassin to spamc in our procmail. > > > > * > > is there an equivalent of 'spamassassin -d' for spamc? > > > Do you really mean "spamassassin -D"? -d does markup stripping, -D > does debugging. > NO, I really mean -d . no one has ideas why the SA3.2 is complaining about having rights to the .spamassassin file when the same non-root user is being used for spamd and spamc ?