Is spam assassin smart enough to not auto-learn (bayesian) spam if the default tests "allready" detect it as spam... ? What I'm wondering is if the other tests have allready deamed it to be spam, then why would you want to increase the size of your bayesian db... Bayesian I believe would be better applied to messages that appear to be slipping past the other tests...
- Bayes Auto Learn Daniel Aquino
- Re: Bayes Auto Learn JamesDR
- Re: Bayes Auto Learn Kelson
- Re: Bayes Auto Learn Matt Kettler