Theo Van Dinter wrote: >> Not really. A rot13 of an email-address should not substitute '@' >> and '.'. > > Again, don't think of rot13 specifically. Single substition cipher.
Possibly, but in that case the rule doesn't even remotely work according to its description. It will never match a correct rot13 substitution of an email address, coz' you'd would NEVER get '^' and '.'. Anyway, maybe it makes sense to some to look for incorrectly rot13'd email-addresses, but why not catch the correctly rot13'd also? /Per Jessen, Zürich
