jean-philippe luiggi-2 wrote:
>
> Hello Roman,
>
> It's not a problem with SA but with the bayes's concept instead.
> Keeping an "big" but "old" bayes's database doesn't mean
> you'll catch the new spam.
> Each day, spammers change them in order to evade detection so in
> order to be as accurate as possible you need to learn often.
>
> In the last one i got, there were 3 words relating to
> spam for more than 200 regular.
>
> Best regards.
>
Thanks for quick answer, but what about advice. What to do? Learn? What to
do with old BAYES-base?
Roman
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Bayes-became-to-work-very-bad-tf3958378.html#a11232591
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
