EDIT: My mistake - the URIBLs are listed in two different places in the 3.2.1 rules table! However URIBL_BLACK does seem to be listed twice with different names and scores...
I have just been picking through some of the changes in 3.2.1 (having just installed it) to see what impact this will have on my custom rules and RBLs etc and have noticed somthing strange! 3.2.0 checked the following URIBLs http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_0_x.html: URIBL_SBL URIBL_SC_SURBL URIBL_WS_SURBL URIBL_PH_SURBL URIBL_OB_SURBL URIBL_AB_SURBL 3.2.1 checks the following URIBLs http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_2_x.html: URIBL_COMPLETEWHOIS URIBL_RHS_ABUSE URIBL_RHS_AHBL URIBL_RHS_BOGUSMX URIBL_RHS_DOB URIBL_RHS_DSN URIBL_RHS_POST URIBL_RHS_TLD_WHOIS URIBL_RHS_URIBL_BLACK URIBL_RHS_URIBL_GREY URIBL_RHS_WHOIS URIBL_XS_SURBL (URL listed in XS SURBL - TEsting) My question is: Does URIBL_XS_SURBL replace all the previous SURBL black lists? Is it in effect multi.surbl.org? I can't find any details on XS_SURBL on the surbl.org website... If it is a multiple check then this will reduce the scoring of some SPAM as it is scored at 1, when some of the old SURBL rules where scored at 2, 3, and even 4! Not a problem IMHO as SA now includes several other good URI BLs including the excelent URIBL_BLACK. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Changes-to-SURBL-in-SA-3.2.1--tf3969802.html#a11267936 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
