Rob McEwen wrote: > Why not just let the quality (or lack of quality) of the plugin speak > for itself. If anyone stars spotting FPs (even a tiny but) and these > trace back to Marc, THEN perhaps this would be a useful discussion.
I beg to differ. I have to have _some_ idea about the data I'm using for my filtering. Personally, I can't use your "suck it and see" approach. > Otherwise, I'm going to assume that Marc's data is pretty good. I think it is too, but I would still like to know HOW it is being gathered. It is important in trying to determine how trustworthy it is, I think. /Per Jessen, Zürich
