On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:17:16 -0400, SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 05:39 18-07-2007, Paul Griffith wrote:
See this link:
http://www.cse.yorku.ca/~paulg/missed-spam.html
Both messages scored 13.9 and hits FH_FROMEML_NOTLD,RDNS_NONE,
URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL.
This was tested on a system without any additional rules and without
Bayes.
Your SpamAssassin setup gave the first message a score of 4.5 and the
second one a score of 4.6. They may not have been in the all URI
blacklists at the time your mail server received the message. Both
messages hit RCVD_IN_PBL and RDNS_NONE. If you add 0.5 to the score for
any of these two rules, the scores of these messages would reach your
threshold.
Are you using Bayes? See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesInSpamAssassin
Regards,
-sm
We have bayes turned off. I will take a look at URL listed above and keep
digging!
Thanks
Paul