"Knowing I have CR"? Hah! I have Greylisting and SA. That's it. Oh, I also block Spamhaus.org's DROP list net blocks. Other than that, nothing.
I just resent being told I have the "burden" of verifying senders, regardless of the context. You wanna send a message to me? Prove yourself worthy. (Not you, personally, of course; I speak w/r/t the bulk -- pun intended -- of Internet senders.) -- Robot Terror ³Always a treat, never a threat² http://robotterror.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 7/23/07 3:55 PM, "Michael Scheidell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ostensibly wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robot Terror [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 4:28 PM >> To: Skip Brott; spamd >> Subject: Re: not everyone is happy with SA >> >> >> On 7/20/07 12:55 PM, "Skip Brott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ostensibly wrote: >> >>> If I send an email to a valid >>> address, I find it a bit offensive that they send a >> challenge back. >>> Why is it my responsibility as the sender to teach another >> system to >>> accept mail from me? >> >> Why is it my responsibility as a holder of a valid email >> address to accept mail from anyone who wants to send me the >> mail? As the owner of the email address or, as the admin of >> the domain's mail server, I have no obligation to accept your >> mail at all. > > Right, you have the right to drop any email you want on the floor. > You don't have the right to bounce crap back to me (so, knowing you > probably have CR, I didn't cc you) > >> >> Obligations should be on the sender. >> > Why? > Where is that in the RFC's or common law in any civilized nation? Or is > this just in your mind? > _________________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(tm). > For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com > _________________________________________________________________________
