> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > The downside is, that even if user train much, they'll get _much_ > > of spam hitting only 3.5 points with BAYES_99.
On 26.07.07 09:30, John D. Hardin wrote: > There's some reluctance to put Poison Pill rules into the default > distribution... :) > > If you trust your Bayes training, then increase the score of BAYES_99. > Mine is at 4.5 (which is better but still doesn't make it a poison > pill). ... and since 4.5 doesn't seem to be poison pill even for me, I wonder why there's reluctance to bump it at least to 4.0 :) Could bayes also count number of spams/hams in database to narrow its decisions? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "To Boot or not to Boot, that's the question." [WD1270 Caviar]
