Dan Barker wrote: > That's not "Consumer Friendly", that's just WRONG! > > Glad you found it. >
...well If you were doing "RBL-style" lookups, don't they exclusively return 127.* addresses on matches - i.e. "no such host" or "address 204.4.4.4" should both be treated as "no such host" as far as RBL software is concerned? Sounds to me like the RBL software is wrong - not OpenDNS (hence me bringing it up in the first place) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
