> Bret Miller wrote: > > Received: from [206.74.184.2] (HELO [206.74.184.2]) > > by mail.wcg.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) > > ... > > Meaning that there was no RDNS for 206.74.184.2 and when it said helo, it > > said "HELO [206.74.184.2]". However, SA is not parsing it that way. So, can > > anyone tell me how to write the received header so SA understands it?
On 01.09.07 13:41, Bob Proulx wrote: > Hmm... I think if you replace "HELO" with "unknown" that it might > parse. I did not look at the SA parsing rules but a typical MTA would > have placed "unknown" there instead of the HELO. as far as I understand it, the string in parentheses is the helo string and that's why is HELO there. Typical MTA places helo string before parentheses and RDNS and/or IP between them. Seems this is the opposite case. > I would try that. A > typical MTA would place an unresolving line such as this following: > > Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) > > The part after the "from" would be the verbatim string from the HELO > exchange. It can't really be trusted. But the RDNS part as you > observed should not be HELO. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?
