Other guys wrote:
-----------------------
Well, what makes you think that Bayes is missing anything? SA needs to
be updated to work properly.
I keep all of the capture spam in a folder for examination. Even the
worst of the spam gives the following analysis:
Content analysis details: (17.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
1.0 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type=
entry
3.3 TVD_RCVD_IP4 TVD_RCVD_IP4
1.6 TVD_RCVD_IP TVD_RCVD_IP
2.6 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO
0.0 T_TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1 BODY: T_TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04 BODY: HTML: images with 0-400 bytes of words
2.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see
<http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?59.92.110.10> ]
0.5 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[59.92.110.10 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
2.9 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
1.2 PART_CID_STOCK Has a spammy image attachment (by Content-ID)
0.0 PART_CID_STOCK_LESS Has a spammy image attachment (by Content-ID,
more specific)
0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no
rDNS
0.0 STOCK_IMG_HTML Stock spam image part, with distinctive HTML
0.0 STOCK_IMG_HDR_FROM Stock spam image part, with distinctive From
line
with no mention of bayes.
--------------
I have same problem. Some mails aren't be analyzed by bayes filter. My bayes
filter is trained correctly and work fine for many mails, but not for other.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Bayes%3A-What-am-I-missing-tp15542012p15585811.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
