At 14:45 05-09-2008, Greg Troxel wrote:
I don't know that spamassassin pays attention to senderbase; if not this
probablly won't work. I say this, mostly joking, from my experience
with habeas. I have gotten spam on multiple occasions from senders that
are HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI, and complained to habeas - with absolutely
zero useful response. I filed a bug:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5902
and soon heard from habeas, who claimed that they revoked the listing of
that sender.
I then got more spam from a different habeas-accredited spammer, and
complained privately to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and heard nothing back.
So the only rational conclusion seems to be that habeas accreditation is
bogus, and they only respond to public pressure. Perhaps that's not
true and I've been unlucky, but that's how it feels from my end.
The rule in the subject line is described as "Habeas Accredited
Opt-In or Better". That is not double Opt-In. If Habeas is not
responding to complaints sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], then it may
be better to set the current score for that test from -4.3 to 0.
(If anyone thinks streamsend are other than spammers, please email me
privately and let me know)
1. Streamsend requires their users to abide with CAN-SPAM
2. An unsubscribe link is required but double opt-in is not.
3. The domain information in Whois is hidden by a privacy service.
Would you whitelist such a domain?
Regards,
-sm
