On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Rob McEwen wrote:
Or, these could be "False-False Positives"... which is a very good thing because that would mean that those were really spams that would have scored "below threshold" without use of the new list. (or, some mix of these two)
So, for the purposes of an analysis like this, perhaps the results should be broken into *three* categories: obviously spam, obviously ham, and borderline.
-- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- It is not the business of government to make men virtuous or religious, or to preserve the fool from the consequences of his own folly. -- Henry George ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 42 days until the Presidential Election
