>From: Dan Schaefer [mailto:d...@performanceadmin.com]
>For those of you that manage these rules, >URI_OBFU_X9_WS, URI_OBFU_WWW, AE_MEDS38, AE_MEDS39 did not mark this email as >spam I'm up to AE_MED45, so I wouldn't expect AE_MEDS38 and 39 to be hitting anything currently. >http://pastebin.com/m40f7cff4 This is not an obfuscated domain. You can see that it hit two URIBLs - JP and WS. I would have expected it to be in URIBL_BLACK (or at least GOLD) as well as Invaluement's URIBL. There are plenty of mechanisms to catch valid URIs - that's not the purpose of the obfuscation rules. And, you still got 15 points - so, what's the problem? -- Dan
