On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:44:27 -0400 "Terry Carmen" <te...@cnysupport.com> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:33:40 -0400 > > "Terry Carmen" <te...@cnysupport.com> wrote: > > > >> The backscatter would not have been received, since the sender is > >> on a number of RBLs. > > > > It's the IP address of the botnet PC that's on the RBLs, the > > backscatter doesn't come from there, it comes from the recipients > > of the spam. > > > > See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backscatter_(e-mail) > > Regardless of whether or not the message was backscatter, The sending > system (triband-mum-59.184.51.13.mtnl.net.in) is blacklisted, Of course it's blacklisted, but would you care to explain how rejecting mail from 59.184.51.13 helps, when the backscatter doesn't come from there?
