(back from vacation ;) BTW, could you add
tflags nopublish to any rules? or use a T_ prefix on the rule names. that will ensure the testing rules won't get into any published ruleset accidentally. this is very important to avoid accidentally causing a production-level DOS on the BL's servers.... --j. On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 14:41, Warren Togami <wtog...@redhat.com> wrote: > I'm looking to add other DNSBL's to tomorrow's weekly mass check. I realize > most of them probably are too broken to bother, but it would be nice to get > some real numbers to confirm it so since the Internet lacks any real DNSBL > comparisons that include Ham FP safety. > > http://antispam.imp.ch/06-dnsbl.html > This one seems to have 3% of the hits compared to PSBL, so I am not > bothering to test it in masscheck. > > http://bl.csma.biz/ > It seems that this blacklist is simply dead. Zero hits on their "SBL" list > within the last day. > > Any other DNSBL's out there that you folks use that are worth comparing? > > Warren Togami > wtog...@redhat.com > > -- --j.
