On Nov 25, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 25.11.09 03:23, jdow wrote: >> Having a little help might help them maintain a better product. >> But (that bitter word), the basic concept is broken. If the spammer >> can make more money than it costs to get on the Habeas whitelist >> then they will pull the same trick I've seen here in California in the >> construction trades. > > Some time ago they used to sue spammers, according to discussion here they > don't anymore. Maybe that's one of their biggest problems.
Actually, the legal threat over the old X-Habeas header never accomplished anything. It's been much more effective to simply stop whitelisting anyone who is sending spam. -- J.D. Falk <jdf...@returnpath.net> Return Path Inc
