dar...@chaosreigns.com writes: > On 09/08, Greg Troxel wrote: >> Some rules seem to have the description include the IP address that >> was looked up in the whitelist/blacklist. Others don't, and it makes it >> a bit hard to guess (since trusted/etc. processing is slightly tricky). >> So I think it would be good if all dnsbl rules listed the IP address >> that hit. > > I agree. What rules do not list the IP? I think this is something worth > opening a bug for, if you can specify the rules.
It seems things have gotten a lot better since I first noticed this
issue. I went looking in relatively recent spam (that scored <= 6), and
found the following rules that could benefit from better specifying what
they are complaining about.
* 0.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE
* 0.1 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST DNS_FROM_RFC_POST
* 0.1 DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS
* 2.0 RCVD_IN_SSBL RCVD_IN_SSBL
* 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
* 0.0 RCVD_NOT_IN_IPREPDNS Sender not listed at
* http://www.chaosreigns.com/iprep/
(the other IPREPDNS rules give the address)
pgpwcZ0S8PZfI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
