On 17/06/13 16:14, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Jason Haar skrev den 2013-06-17 00:48: > >> That's it - I'm removing SPF... > > hardfail is for mta, softfails is for spamassassin, if your mta accept > hardfail spf, then you self ask for it > ?? SA scores hardfails as 0.0 due to the high positive rate. Therefore blocking on SPF hardfails must lead to a high FP rate too? If your organization is willing to live with valid email being bounced, fine - but I'm going to listen to our SA overlords on this one...
(...or the SA score is incorrect of course. This thread is a bit of a challange - here we have an example of SA saying one thing, and everyone else [well, 3 people ;)] saying "block hardfails" on the other. One must be right and the other wrong...?) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +1 408 481 8171 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
