--On August 8, 2013 1:49:18 PM -0700 John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
How is .001 in any way considered a "large" penalty?
SPF is _by itself_ not useful as a spam sign.
If you're seeing a lot of facebook spam that fails SPF because it's being
forged, then a rule that checks SPF_FAIL *IF* the mail claims to be from
Facebook, and adds a point or two, would be more reasonable.
Ok, that sounds reasonable, but that still doesn't align with the comment
in the 50_scores.cf file. ;)
Can you provide an example? I've done some basic custom rules, but the
above is a little more complex.
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
