Hi guys,

I'm using Kevin's KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC rules for the multi.pccc.com
URIBL. Why is it designed to be a poison pill? It caught cvent.com,
causing a bunch of mail to FP.

I'm just curious if this URIBL is indeed this trustworthy, if these
KAM rules are still used, and how it is working for you?

header     KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC    eval:check_rbl_from_host('pccc',
'multi.pccc.com.', '127.0.0.4')
describe   KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC    From address listed in PCCC URIBL
tflags     KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC    net
score      KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC    5.0
meta          __KAM_URIBL_PCCC  (KAM_BODY_URIBL_PCCC +
KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC + KAM_RCVD_URIBL_PCCC >= 3)

Thanks,
Alex

Reply via email to