Hi guys, I'm using Kevin's KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC rules for the multi.pccc.com URIBL. Why is it designed to be a poison pill? It caught cvent.com, causing a bunch of mail to FP.
I'm just curious if this URIBL is indeed this trustworthy, if these KAM rules are still used, and how it is working for you? header KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC eval:check_rbl_from_host('pccc', 'multi.pccc.com.', '127.0.0.4') describe KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC From address listed in PCCC URIBL tflags KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC net score KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC 5.0 meta __KAM_URIBL_PCCC (KAM_BODY_URIBL_PCCC + KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC + KAM_RCVD_URIBL_PCCC >= 3) Thanks, Alex