Good point/question. I want to avoid every email where contained in the header information the 'Reply-To' field is constructed in this format:
'user@[literal-ip-address]' an example: 'bill@[192.168.1.10]' or 'bill@[10.10.5.6]' Can you tell if my format/syntax is proper in the rule, how I think, would be formatted? (local.cf) -------------------- Whiltelist_from @friendly_domain.com ... blacklist_from @"\[[0..255].[0..255] .[0..255] .[0..255]\]" <<<---That one. .... Followed by other proper 'local.cf' properly formatted rules. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Kai Schaetzl [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 12:31 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Feedback on blacklist rule I plan to write William A. Fink wrote on Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:41:52 -0400: > My question is: The SMTP protocol allows a return address to be > '<[email protected]>' and '[email protected]' and some other variations, > I'll assume. Are you really talking about ip-address.*com* or just ip-address? SMTP allows ip-literals [ip-address], not ip-address. I think. Kai -- Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
