On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:48 PM -0700 John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org>
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> In looking at why some spam is still making it through, it appears that
> Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups:
I'm working with someone who seems to be having the same problem in 3.3.1
- thanks for noting this, I will take a closer look.
Thanks. The scoring can vary depending on when the pyzor callback fails. For
example, in another run, the pyzor error doesn't come back until after more
of the URI checks are done:
etc. I.e., the scoring is completely erratic based on where URIBL processing
is when the pyzor callback fails.
That's similar to the behavior they're seeing. Much lower URIBL hits than
when running SA from the command line on the test MX, and the log shows
problems with pyzor (though the excerpt I saw didn't mention a traceback,
it just said "no output").
FWIW they're running amavisd-new, and we're trying to figure out why the
scores on MTA-processed messages are so much lower than when the same
message is passed through command-line SA in debug mode.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Politicians never accuse you of "greed" for wanting other people's
money, only for wanting to keep your own money. -- Joseph Sobran
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: Albert Einstein's 135th Birthday
