and to make clear why Nick Edwars just should shut up https://www.mail-archive.com/bind-users@lists.isc.org/msg19672.html
the out-of-context there where two *off-list* messages i brought back to the list *including an answer* with asking why respond in private and days later Nick was bored and tried flamewar as often before on other lists that happens because this fool filters out my mails and from time to time decides to respond to partially quotes Am 21.09.2014 um 03:46 schrieb Reindl Harald: > Am 21.09.2014 um 03:44 schrieb Nick Edwards: >> Dont pay too much attention to reindl, he is a well known internet >> troll, and highly abusive to those who disagree with him, hes been >> kicked off or moderated on so many lists now, most folks have lost >> count, and most folks ignore him, the stain is best treated as a >> stain, washed away with good rules :-) > > what about just shut up instead starting flamewars on > every list we both meet if you have nothing to say? > >> On 9/21/14, RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 15:48:05 +0200 >>> Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>>> http://www.antivirushelptool.com/spamassassin/header/USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL >>>> that's too much and gives even a message on systems where >>>> BAYES_99 and BAYES_999 would reach 8.0 a negative score >>> >>> Do you have any evidence for it being too much? It seems about right >>> to me. >>> >>> If you have an actual problem I'd suggest you use unwhitelist_from_dkim >>> locally and report the domain so it can be considered for delisting. >>> >>> The dkim default whitelist contains domains that send a lot of >>> autogenerated and bulk mail, but have a very low probabilty of sending >>> spam
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
