On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote: > On 2/10/2015 9:00 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@pccc.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 2/9/2015 4:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>> >>>> what is that below introduced with tonights update and get triggered now >>>> for every single mail and why does such things not automatically get >>>> caught >>>> before push? >>> >>> It was part of a commit on Jan 30, >>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/commits/190790, that >>> likely needs a has_ function for a can() if encapsulation if you aren't >>> using the latest trunk to avoid warnings. >>> >>> Working on a patch now and a fix to the rules. >> >> Hi KAM, >> >> Still seeing these, even after today's update, > > Can you grab the 25_spf.cf from > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/25_spf.cf?view=co and > see if that works?
Confirmed, Yes, that works (3.003002 on Debian Wheezy). Thanks! > Then I'll hope the rule update hits tomorrow. There is some vagueness to my > understanding of exactly how long rules take from start to finish to go > outbound. There are some emergency rule generation procedures if someone > wants to help the project. I'm interested. Let me know how to begin. > I would guess I missed the cutoff for yesterday's masscheck and tomorrow's > will include it. Ahh, that makes sense. Thanks again, -Jim P.
