On 03/27/2016 06:58 PM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Has anyone actually gotten a single legit message from that domain?
Never. WTF was ICANN thinking? I occasionally go through the lists of abused gTLD here: http://www.surbl.org/tld/ It certainly saves a lot of hygiene processing time to just dump this garbage at the outset. Now that I think about it, a default block for "fresh" gTLD would be nice. I've never had a complaint about these blocks: From:link REJECT From:website REJECT From:berlin REJECT From:club REJECT From:email REJECT From:guru REJECT From:wang REJECT From:xyz REJECT From:photography REJECT From:rocks REJECT From:click REJECT From:xn--czrs0t REJECT From:xn--hxt814e REJECT From:xn--flw351e REJECT From:xn--qcka1pmc REJECT From:xn--45q11c REJECT From:xn--vermgensberatung-pwb REJECT From:xn--vermgensberater-ctb REJECT From:xn--p1acf REJECT From:xn--vhquv REJECT From:xn--xhq521b REJECT From:xn--1qqw23a REJECT From:xn--kput3i REJECT From:xn--4gbrim REJECT From:xn--czr694b REJECT From:xn--80adxhks REJECT From:xn--ses554g REJECT From:xn--czru2d REJECT From:xn--rhqv96g REJECT From:xn--nqv7f REJECT From:xn--i1b6b1a6a2e REJECT From:xn--nqv7fs00ema REJECT From:xn--c1avg REJECT From:xn--d1acj3b REJECT From:xn--mgbab2bd REJECT From:xn--6frz82g REJECT From:xn--io0a7i REJECT From:xn--55qx5d REJECT From:xn--fiq64b REJECT From:xn--3bst00m REJECT From:xn--6qq986b3xl REJECT From:xn--fiq228c5hs REJECT From:xn--3ds443g REJECT From:xn--55qw42g REJECT From:xn--zfr164b REJECT From:xn--q9jyb4c REJECT From:xn--ngbc5azd REJECT From:xn--80asehdb REJECT From:xn--80aswg REJECT From:xn--unup4y REJECT From:ninja REJECT From:gripe REJECT From:loans REJECT From:luxury REJECT From:market REJECT From:marketing REJECT From:pink REJECT From:whoswho REJECT From:top REJECT
