On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Ramachandran, Vishwanath(IE10) < vishwanath.ramachand...@honeywell.com> wrote:
> Does it means, subversion 1.4.6 does support swig, ? > Yes > > > Regards > > Vishwanath > > > > > > > > *From:* vishwajeet singh [mailto:dextrou...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 16, 2010 12:41 PM > *To:* Ramachandran, Vishwanath(IE10) > *Cc:* users@subversion.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: python bindings > > > > > > We have subversion 1.4.6, Does swig support 1.4? Any suggestions welcome > > > > > > First of all Subversion 1.4 series is no more supported so you should > upgrade it to higher version. > > To answer your question Subversion 1.4 had support for swig bindings and > irrespective of where it's being used it can interact with Subversion. > > > > > > *From:* Ramachandran, Vishwanath(IE10) > *Sent:* Monday, February 15, 2010 5:33 PM > *To:* users@subversion.apache.org > *Subject:* python bindings > > > > Hi there > > > > Will python-bindings* swig* support svn hooks scripts? There is a > Collabnet subversion, which comes with all the packages(in-built) including > python which supports the hooks script. > > > > But since we do not use Collabnet subversion, we are in need of only python > bindings, which supports hooks scripts > > > > Please suggest, how it is feasible!! > > > > Regards > > Vishwanath > > *Desk*: +91 80 26588360 Extn: 48555 > > > > > > > > > -- > Vishwajeet Singh > +91-9657702154 | dextrou...@gmail.com | http://singhvishwajeet.com > Twitter: http://twitter.com/vishwajeets | LinkedIn: > http://www.linkedin.com/in/singhvishwajeet > -- Vishwajeet Singh +91-9657702154 | dextrou...@gmail.com | http://singhvishwajeet.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/vishwajeets | LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/singhvishwajeet